Tony Sidaway (minorityreport@bluebottle.com) [050120 13:02]:
csherlock@ljh.com.au said:
Surely a rollback should be classed as a revert?
It's a gray area. If an admin knowingly abused rollback power while blocked this should probably be a summary de-admin offence, in my opinion, but here Everyking was apparently using his rollback power to deal with simple vandalism, which strikes me as a very admirable way to use his suddenly acquired spare time.
The current arbcom temporary injunction on Everyking says that he gets one edit *of any sort* per day to any article Ashlee Simpson related (and of course he can be as convincing as he likes on talk pages so his edits are accepted) - and that should he be blocked, using admin rollback on Ashlee-related articles will get a de-adminning for the duration of the case.
So far as I am aware, Everyking has not in fact abused his admin powers on the articles in contention. If this is not the case, please let us know and put it on /Evidence !
- d.