There are various commercial and non commercial projects.I'm in touch
with some of them also. The requirement for reliability here is such
that a peer-reviewed traditional way of development is really needed.
Naturally, were CAS more accommodating, they might never have been
needed. But the people there dont seem to think about it that way.
It's a shame to have to replace a technologically excellent solution
just because of an overprotective business attitude. ~~~~
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 6:15 PM, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 09/03/2008, Geoffrey Plourde
<geo.plrd(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Yes, since they want to give us hemorrhoids. We
should completely bypass them. The >world needs a free version of CAS.
Various people are working on the problem and a wiki is not really the
way to do it see:
http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/blogs/murrayrust/
--
geni
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG