Given the user's history and current behaviour, even after the
year-long ban, is there any reason that a permanent ban would be out
of order? As I understand it, the only restriction on the ArbComm's
banning duration is self-imposed.
Sam
On 7/28/05, David Gerard <fun(a)thingy.apana.org.au> wrote:
Fred Bauder (fredbaud(a)ctelco.net) [050728 22:16]:
He isn't just back. He's back doing a lot
of crap. Check out
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?
title=User_talk:Plautus_satire&diff=prev&oldid=19773597
I think maybe another year without a lot of fuss is probably what we
need to do.
I have blocked him for 48 hours based on the quoted edit. I will
reopen the case today and put a year's ban up for a vote.
I was going to say "we should maybe wait for a case to be brought", but
then I read the quoted edit. At this stage I'll declare YUO AR A ROUGE ARB
and probably agree with you entirely.
- d.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l