I raise an objection: that's not what it's called in English (my overriding objection), and "pseudo-medicine" is an invented term hence original research.
Very well, you're probably right.
I think I've said my piece on this topic and I've got a better idea of the various opinions of other community members. It seems we have reached the typical Wikipedian conclusion of calling a truce on a status quo which is unacceptable to everyone :)
At any rate I will proceed with caution in any changes I make to these articles and categories.
The current article on [[Alternative medicine]] has suffered a bad case of Gohde and could do with a lot of cleaning up, but the Category links to Pseudoscience and Protoscience get the point across IMO (having as it does both).
Currently the Protoscience category includes such topics as String theory and Quantum gravity as well as Phrenology (old debunked non-sense) and Biorythm (recent debunked non-sense). To me it does not seem that these things have enough in common to be usefully included in the same category.
Regards, Haukur