I raise an objection: that's not what it's
called in English (my overriding
objection), and "pseudo-medicine" is an invented term hence original
research.
Very well, you're probably right.
I think I've said my piece on this topic and I've
got a better idea of the various opinions of other
community members. It seems we have reached the typical
Wikipedian conclusion of calling a truce on a status
quo which is unacceptable to everyone :)
At any rate I will proceed with caution in any
changes I make to these articles and categories.
The current article on [[Alternative medicine]] has
suffered a bad case of
Gohde and could do with a lot of cleaning up, but the Category links to
Pseudoscience and Protoscience get the point across IMO (having as it does
both).
Currently the Protoscience category includes such
topics as String theory and Quantum gravity as well
as Phrenology (old debunked non-sense) and Biorythm
(recent debunked non-sense). To me it does not seem
that these things have enough in common to be usefully
included in the same category.
Regards,
Haukur