And if so, in which sense?
I've just put [[List of groups referred to as cults]] on
AfD:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_groups…
(For the 3rd time by me alone, so I expect some eye-rolling and name-calling)
My main concern is about NOR, and I suspect some other lists having the same problem.
Whereas each individual entry has its source (that's just the idea of the list, that
you google for some source calling Wikipedia, Randism, Shia and whatsnot a
"cult"), but the list as such, even cum grano salis, has never been published,
hopefully because no one has considered it to make much sense, to link such a diverse set
of "groups".
As WP:NOR was invented to relieve us from difficult decisions (Is "X theory of hairy
strings" a valid Theory of Everything? -- We don't bother to check the formulas,
it's not published in peer-reviewed journals), shouldn't this axe also prune more
creative lists?
Regards,
Peter Jacobi
[[User:Pjacobi]]
--
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
Ideal für Modem und ISDN:
http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer