"The Cunctator" wrote
Huh. Just because one can't think of a reason that
it would be of interest
to have a list of mathematicians of Erdos Number 3 doesn't mean that noone
can. Wikipedia ain't paper.
Trouble is: I have checked that my own Erdos number is at most 4. Knowing that it is
exactly 4, rather than 3, is equivalent to knowing a huge amount about collaborative
papers ... which is a needle-in-haystack search.
Charles
-----------------------------------------
Email sent from
www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Visit
www.ntlworld.com/security for more information