Actually, yes, I know quite a few people who routinely speak of (and
in) hex digits and the like. Now, of course, they all tend to be
programmers. But how many people do you think, if it happened, would
wake up, call their friend, and say "WOW! Did you hear they discovered
a new allotrope of carbon called blabitychasomethingblehwhatsit?" I
can't imagine very few people would use such a name, if our fictional
allotrope existed. (I strongly doubt most people could tell you what a
fullerene is either, and that's a very real one.) We quite often use
technical and scientific terminology that very few people would use in
day-to-day conversation. In this case, the number has a great
significance. As to "breaking text", yes, we should only write it
-once-. But we shouldn't fail to write it that once, because we're
scared that the Big Bad Lawyers will Come And Get Us. The worst
they'll do is send a DMCA notice, and we'd have to take it down
temporarily. They likely won't even do that.
On 5/2/07, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 03/05/07, Todd Allen <toddmallen(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
You can't honestly be serious, Doc. We
don't write an article about
"that company that starts with an M and made the popular operating
system that starts with a W", we write about Microsoft and Windows.
When we write about The Pirate Bay, we don't say "Well, there's this
one website out there that distributes pirated software", we identify
and name them, despite the highly-questionable legality of what
they're doing. When we write about things, we identify and mention
them.
Tell me this, please. Is there *anyone* in the world who would walk up
to a friend and say - hey did you hear the news about [string of hex
digits]? We can write an article which is perfectly explanatory,
covers this whole fracas, and doesn't ever mention the actual value of
the key; indeed, it would look and sound perfectly natural unless you
were explicitly looking for the value.
(Consider a brief thought experiment: a long numerical string is
unwieldy and clumsy; it breaks the flow of text. Any article on it
would rapidly become one mention of the number and "the key" or "the
value" or "n" elsewhere in the text, and the article would be titled
something accordingly - here, "HD DVD key" or the like, but I don't
know what for our thought experiment. The number itself has no
intrinsic numerical significance*, so there wouldn't be a section
devoted to discussing it as a number. Leave this article to be edited
for a month; someone quietly takes the value out, along with all the
other usual alterations. I'm really not sure you'd even notice when
you came back to look at it again...)
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk
* though we all remember the "proof all numbers are interesting", I'm
sure!
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
Freedom is the right to know that 2+2=4. From this all else follows.