I did not block Svigor, and have no plans to do so. I agree that so far he has played by
the rules, and as long as he does so, I have no problems with him.
RickK
Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)ctelco.net> wrote:
He mentioned it as a point in argument. He did not threaten to invite them. And in any
event, according to established Wikipedia policy they and their neonazi viewpoints are
welcome. He may have technically broken the three revert rule, but that is to be expected
from a new user when they first enounter determined opposition. His spam linking is not in
itself a violation.
Due to the frustrating nature of dealing with this type of point of view editor, your
frustration is understandable, but you can't properly ban folks, even of disagreeable
views, if they follow Wikipedia rules.
He tried, in a show of good faith, to discuss many of the controverted points on the talk
page of [[white nationalism]] but is not getting much discussion on the points he raised.
Fred
From: Rick <giantsrick13(a)yahoo.com>
Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 21:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Protesting my ban
Please note that this user has already threatened to invite posters on a White nationalist
website to "visit" WIkipedia in order to make sure that the [[White
nationalism]] article matches their POV. And his comment that he has not reverted an
article is untrue. See the history of [[White nationalism]]. He has also spam linked the
White nationalism article, but I've used up my three reverts.
RickK
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger