On 12/15/06, Parker Peters onmywayoutster@gmail.com wrote:
... to get the answers he needs so that he doesn't step on the toes of OFFICE.
If those answers aren't provided, if OFFICE isn't willing to tell an ..
As an aside, could we stop writing "office" in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS? It's starting to kind of creep me out. ;-) The office is not _that_ impressive; believe me, I've been there. :-)
I don't think it's likely that an editor will be indef-blocked for good faith edits anytime soon -- and if it does happen, we'll try to straighten it out ASAP. Most of the articles under office protection end up there because they were written by people not familiar with our policies of verifiability and neutrality, or those deliberately violating them. In general, the process is: stub it down and start from scratch, with more trusted editors taking the lead.
I think the office process is still one we need to eventually reform (make more transparent, scalable, etc.). But right now we're in the middle of a major fundraiser and other organizational reforms, so it's not the highest priority for Board+ED+Legal Counsel.