On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 WJhonson(a)aol.com wrote:
# Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons
# whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable
# should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion
Look carefully
at that middle line. It does NOT have to be negative in
order for it to be removed.
"Contentious"
Like "consensus", "contentious" is not defined by a single editor
objecting.
So you're seriously suggesting that the line about him being a director
should *not* have been removed, even though there was no source for it and
he sincerely objected to it?