Isn't that what the Nupedia is for?
I think Nupedia's big draw was "reviewed content" and Wikipedia's was
"anyone can edit".
Daniel Ehrenberg wrote:
For wikipedia to be an valid educational source, it
needs to have some kind of approval system. From what
I understand, this has been discussed since Day 1 of
Wikipedia, but I think it is time to impliment it. If
wikipedia is ever to be printed or used in schools, it
must be scrutinized and validated (or invalidated) on
an article-by-article basis.
-LittleDan
--- Christopher Mahan <chris_mahan(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>I feel that an encyclopedia ofour caliber can really
>positively
>impact the lives and education of younger people. By
>which I mean
>anyone who can read and click a mouse (I don't know
>how old that is,
>but my guess is around 4 years old)
>
>I would want to be able to send a 10 year old
>inquisitive mind to the
>W without any reservation.
>
>