Isn't that what the Nupedia is for? I think Nupedia's big draw was "reviewed content" and Wikipedia's was "anyone can edit".
Daniel Ehrenberg wrote:
For wikipedia to be an valid educational source, it needs to have some kind of approval system. From what I understand, this has been discussed since Day 1 of Wikipedia, but I think it is time to impliment it. If wikipedia is ever to be printed or used in schools, it must be scrutinized and validated (or invalidated) on an article-by-article basis.
-LittleDan
--- Christopher Mahan chris_mahan@yahoo.com wrote:
I feel that an encyclopedia ofour caliber can really positively impact the lives and education of younger people. By which I mean anyone who can read and click a mouse (I don't know how old that is, but my guess is around 4 years old)
I would want to be able to send a 10 year old inquisitive mind to the W without any reservation.