This is to do with categorisation (the article refers to categories,
but then refers to pages when those 'pages' are in fact dynamic
listings generated on the fly).
One place to raise this would be:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Categorization
It is also worth reading this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categorization
The issue of whether to categorise by gender or not has been debated
for a long time on Wikipedia. This is not some recent thing. See here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categorization/Gender,_race_and_sexu…
That is a whole page devoted to how to categorise (or not) by gender,
race and sexuality. It is also possible there was a recent discussion
on this somewhere here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion
Indeed, there is discussion here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_A…
Carcharoth
On 4/25/13, Kathleen McCook <klmccook(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Wikipedia's overwhelmingly male user-editors
began the bizarre forced
gender migration on Tuesday
The New York Times::
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/opinion/sunday/wikipedias-sexism-toward-f…
http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/wikipedia_moves_women_to_american_women_nov…
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l