On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Ken Arromdee <arromdee(a)rahul.net> wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Delirium wrote:
Okay.
Considering that this happened in a BLP, this is one of the stupidest
suggestions I've seen.
Considering that it wasn't negative information or
at all harmful to the
subject, *this* is one of the stupid suggestions I've seen.
I will repeat: unsourced information doesn't *have* to be negative to be
removed from a BLP. It says it *right there in the rules*.
If nothing else this is relevant because the negativity of any
particular fact may be highly subjective.
A subject is likely to consider anything which is untrue to be
"negative" in any case: "You said you've never been a director, but WP
says right here...".