On 12/1/05, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
geni wrote:
On 12/1/05, Daniel Mayer <maveric149 at
yahoo.com> wrote:
> (better RC patrol features, trust networks to
filter RC and watchlists,
> article validation, etc).
RC patrol is reaching it's pratical limit.
I'm seeing more vandalism
on my watchlist and no matter how good the people doing it there is
simply no way for them to know if a large percentage of it is true or
not
Would it be an idea to make RC patrol organised, i.e. people (admins
or not) sign on for shifts, checking all edits in a given block of
time? Two patrollers for each time period should be enough, three or
four for evenings US time. You do RC patrol - would something like
this make sense?
If it were posible it would probably have some utility if only to give
us some idea of the amount of rescoures we have availible.
(I don't know how long the time periods would be -
an hour? 30
minutes? 10 minutes?)
10 minutes. Those who can go longer are free to sign up back to back.
those of us who tend to get disstracted by seeing things we can fix
can still make a contribution
--
geni