2009/2/16 Carcharoth <carcharothwp(a)googlemail.com>om>:
One thing that strikes me is that both articles are
difficult to read
and poorly written. In other words, when something is controversial
and has a high rate of editing, the readability quality invariably
decreases in the ensuing chaos.
That doesn't just apply to controversial subjects. Any subject with a
high edit rate shows the same problem - current events, for example
(they generally end up being timelines in very poor disguise). What it
needs is for someone to periodically go through the whole thing
tidying it up - not a fun job, admittedly, but a necessary one. (This
does happen with some articles, and you can tell the difference.)