-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tony Sidaway wrote:
Mmm, this would make *more* work for arbcom, not less.
Can you explain why you thinkEr, what? We must be misunderstanding
each other, because as I am conceiving of this system, it would be
impossible for ArbCom to have to do more work. At the absolute worst,
it would be the same amount of work. it would be more work for them?
- - Ryan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDRHPg6MKb8lYmCtcRAu0tAKCnpfkkEGpWMiEoaDdIhPJntMSedgCfazHw
xbmfuZ31MN22E3FWZpvInWQ=
=k90S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----