On 5/31/06, Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)ctelco.net>
wrote:
Good question. This was described as a "hit
list". It certainly was a
list of people who were carrying out a legitimate (if wrong-headed)
consensus. I suppose it could have been the basis for a legitimate
request for reconsideration of the decision. We do need to consider
the question of how we deal with users who have strong Islamist
points of view.
Why should "users who have strong Islamist points of view" be treated
any differently than anyone else?
That's a very good question indeed. Currently they *are* treated
differently, because they get blocked even if they follow the rules.
You want an evidence? Please ask Zoe to restore the list I've compiled.
--
Raphael