Here's an idea: why not noindex BLPs while they're being considered on AfD.
We get the best of both worlds, since as the article isn't the number one
ghit, there's no need to speedy non-outrageous articles. I guess we'd also
need to noindex the AfDs themselves.
David
On 27/05/07, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org> wrote:
On 5/27/07, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
Andrew Gray wrote:
>On 27/05/07, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
>
>
>>>That wouldn't really solve the problem at all - it's quite possible
to
>>>have a stable-but-crap article.
"Stable" only really means "pretty
>>>likely it doesn't say Joe is Gay anywhere"...
>>>
>>>
>>If you apply that limitation to stable versions you are right. Stable
>>versioning, however, should be developed to the point where it can do
a
lot more.
Mmmm.... then we're really talking reviewed versions, or finalised
versions, or revision rating structures, or something like that.
Yes, whatever we choose to call it.
[[Silver bullet]]s, maybe?
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l