FWIW, I agree with you guys. We shouldn't throw people out for what
they do or believe in if it's not breaking any wikipedia rules. Anyone
can make a good wikipedian as long as they abide by our policies.
--Mgm
On 7/9/05, Jack Lynch <jack.i.lynch(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I agree, and this brings up the subject of Nazi
wikipedians, or
satanists, or communists and anarchists for that matter. People are
allowed to be themselves, so long as it doesn't break a rule. Being
these things isn't against our rules.
Jack (Sam Spade)
On 7/9/05, Haukur Þorgeirsson <haukurth(a)hi.is> wrote:
This seems fine. The user is clearly not
encouraging anyone to commit crimes. Nor
does he admit to any of his own. He wants
some laws to be changed but that's not a
crime.
This seems fine too and quite similar.
- - -
I don't think we should throw anyone out for
what they *are*. If you can show some troubling
diffs where these users violate a Wikipedia
policy that would be more relevant.
IANAL and IANJ.
Regards,
Haukur
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l