Daniel Mayer wrote:
But we have to start something ala Larry's sifter
idea since we are getting
slammed in the media due to our perceived non-trusted status (I personally
think these objections are laughable since they are comparing us to
encyclopedias that are hundreds of years old and that have very similar
disclaimers).
The objections are perfectly predictable. They are a natural part of
success. Since we are crowding some very big vested interests, these
complaints come as no surprise. Somebody's small private wiki with less
than 100 articles in total and all filled with absolute nonsense would
likely fly completely under the radar with no criticism at all. For
them, criticism might mean much desired publicity.
.
Ec