Daniel Mayer wrote:
But we have to start something ala Larry's sifter idea since we are getting slammed in the media due to our perceived non-trusted status (I personally think these objections are laughable since they are comparing us to encyclopedias that are hundreds of years old and that have very similar disclaimers).
The objections are perfectly predictable. They are a natural part of success. Since we are crowding some very big vested interests, these complaints come as no surprise. Somebody's small private wiki with less than 100 articles in total and all filled with absolute nonsense would likely fly completely under the radar with no criticism at all. For them, criticism might mean much desired publicity. . Ec