On 17/06/07, Slim Virgin <slimvirgin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
No identifying details were revealed. If an admin
candidate (or anyone
else) is violating policy, they have to anticipate that they could be
found out at any time, not only when it's convenient for them.
The fact that it was announced (not discovered) at the single most
inconvenient time -- you surely can't be claiming that as a
coincidence, can you?