On 11/21/05, Philip Sandifer <snowspinner(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 20, 2005, at 10:45 PM, geni wrote:
Well going through the critiria for articles:
1.I've never really understood that one. Defintly needs a 24 hour
limit though
2.no reason to have a limit on that one
3.no reason to have a limit on that one(a link is a link)
4.not sure
5.Can't be done within 24 hours
6.if this type get missed by RC patrol (shouldn't happen) I don't want
to have to waste time taking them through a full AFD
7.Definet 24 clause.
8.already has a 48 hour clause.
I would say that 3 should have, if not 24 hours, at least some lag,
if only because people start articles in different ways.
-Phil
They can recreate it. I can't think of any reason to start an article
by just putting up a link and if they do it's hardly a hudge amount of
work that has been lost. If people want to create articles in a way
that involves them beeing a speedy candidate as some point could they
not do it in their user space?
--
geni