Ray Saintonge wrote
So a few people recently decided that they wanted a
COI policy. Let's
not pretend that there was suddenly a groundswell in support of this policy.
Let's not pretend that's an accurate history.
Someone WAS BOLD and renamed the old WP:VAIN, which was about vanity editing, to WP:COI.
David Gerard appealed for help here in getting the text more compatible with the title.
Exit DG for a bit (Gothing it up on the Yorkshire coast, I surmise).
Meanwhile, in another part of the forest, another guideline page (NB none, but none, of
this is hard policy) has been created by User:Eloquence. This is the one that lays down
how editors on behalf of companies should comport themselves.
I only got involved when DG broadcast his appeal. I resisted the merge (now carried out)
that created a composite page, for as long as I could, and until I could see how to fit
the bits together.
We now do have a composite guideline, not obviously compatible with absolutely everything
elsewhere written about autobiographical writing, not integrating in WP:SPAM, and with
other potential weaknesses. It does however fill in gaping holes in previous material in
this area, making explicit in particular some aspects of procedure at AfD and the
implications if you 'declare an interest'.
While this is all kind of dull, WP:COI is being cited in a current ArbCom case, and a high
profile deletion debate.
Charles
-----------------------------------------
Email sent from
www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Visit
www.ntlworld.com/security for more information