On 2/20/07, Parker Peters <parkerpeters1002(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/20/07, Rob <gamaliel8(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Shouldn't unblock-en-l serve that function now?
If it were actually properly monitored and served a real enforcement
function? Perhaps. Instead, it's just something ignored, yet another rubber
stamp with no real meaning.
So what's the solution then? You have a tiresome amount of things to
say here about imagined malfeasance, so what do you propose we do
about this supposed problem? It would be preferable to come up with a
solution that doesn't expose our volunteers to daily abuse and attacks
and make this list a troll free-for-all.