On 2/20/07, Parker Peters parkerpeters1002@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/20/07, Rob gamaliel8@gmail.com wrote:
Shouldn't unblock-en-l serve that function now?
If it were actually properly monitored and served a real enforcement function? Perhaps. Instead, it's just something ignored, yet another rubber stamp with no real meaning.
So what's the solution then? You have a tiresome amount of things to say here about imagined malfeasance, so what do you propose we do about this supposed problem? It would be preferable to come up with a solution that doesn't expose our volunteers to daily abuse and attacks and make this list a troll free-for-all.