My comment on the reliability isn't suggesting that sampling is completely
unreliable. But sampling with no comment on the selection method? That
sounds like bullshit to me, and I'm not going to trust what is quite
possibly an unreliable sample of whole. If you want to me to trust your
stats, you need to provide more info than that.
On 10/10/07, Robert Rohde <rarohde(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If you like thinking about "events", cascading protection led to an ~80%
drop in the protection rate for images. (Though image protection is only
a
few percent of all protections).
-Robert
On 10/10/07, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/10/2007, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org> wrote:
Here's a couple more events to consider: when
was the captcha for
unregistered edits which add an external link added? how about the
captcha for new article creation?
It'd be interesting to make up a timeline of all the events we can
think of which might possibly affect these numbers, and then attach
them to the chart.
Semiprotection (could go either way); resolution of 550 (probably
uptick in blocks *and* editing activity).
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l