It's hard to say without knowing more details. Many of us act that way about
material that we honestly feel is worthless. Please give some example of
specific edits and images. That way we will have a better feel for what is
going on.
Provisionally, without looking at what is being deleted, such behavior is
unacceptable.
Fred
From: Leif Knutsen <vyerllc(a)gmail.com>
Reply-To: vyer(a)earthlink.net, English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 10:53:00 -0400
To: wikien-l(a)wikipedia.org
Subject: [WikiEN-l] When do deletions become vandalism
At what point do deletions of images, paragraphs, etc., cross the border
from edits to becoming either violations of NPOV or even vandalism? I keep
running into one editor who deletes whole sections of information with no
explanation or a simple dismissal, e.g., "untrue assertion," "no evidence
for this," or sometimes appeal to authority. I think there is an honest
disagreement about the subject matter under editing, but simply deleting
inconvenient facts or assertions is imho bad, and possibly unacceptable,
behavior.
Leif (Leifern)
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l