It's hard to say without knowing more details. Many of us act that way about material that we honestly feel is worthless. Please give some example of specific edits and images. That way we will have a better feel for what is going on.
Provisionally, without looking at what is being deleted, such behavior is unacceptable.
Fred
From: Leif Knutsen vyerllc@gmail.com Reply-To: vyer@earthlink.net, English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 10:53:00 -0400 To: wikien-l@wikipedia.org Subject: [WikiEN-l] When do deletions become vandalism
At what point do deletions of images, paragraphs, etc., cross the border from edits to becoming either violations of NPOV or even vandalism? I keep running into one editor who deletes whole sections of information with no explanation or a simple dismissal, e.g., "untrue assertion," "no evidence for this," or sometimes appeal to authority. I think there is an honest disagreement about the subject matter under editing, but simply deleting inconvenient facts or assertions is imho bad, and possibly unacceptable, behavior.
Leif (Leifern) _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l