On 22/01/07, Gregory Kohs <thekohser(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Doesn't the water chestnut deserve a little better
than this confusing
disambiguation page? It's a pretty common food. Does the Wikipedia
community really expect users to find their way specifically to [[Eleocharis
dulcis]] to get a half-decent write-up on the water chestnuts that many of
their recipes call for?
Just some quick Google results:
+"Water chestnut" +"Eleocharis dulcis"
(
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%2B%22Water+chestnut%22+%2B%22Eleocharis+d…)
produces 807 results)
+"Water chestnut" +"Trapa natans"
(
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox&rl…)
gives 25,700 results
Without searching further, wouldn't the page (were it not a
disambiguation page) better point to T. natans, rather than E. dulcis
as you suggest?
--
Oldak Quill (oldakquill(a)gmail.com)