On 22/01/07, Gregory Kohs thekohser@gmail.com wrote:
Doesn't the water chestnut deserve a little better than this confusing disambiguation page? It's a pretty common food. Does the Wikipedia community really expect users to find their way specifically to [[Eleocharis dulcis]] to get a half-decent write-up on the water chestnuts that many of their recipes call for?
Just some quick Google results: +"Water chestnut" +"Eleocharis dulcis" (http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%2B%22Water+chestnut%22+%2B%22Eleocharis+du...) produces 807 results)
+"Water chestnut" +"Trapa natans" (http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox&rls...) gives 25,700 results
Without searching further, wouldn't the page (were it not a disambiguation page) better point to T. natans, rather than E. dulcis as you suggest?