On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Carcharoth <carcharothwp(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
<snip>
I created a "journal" article in the end. Not part of this experiment,
but my point below (which may have got lost), is valid, I think:
To try and bring this post back on-topic, I suppose my
point is that
stub articles on obscure topics would probably fare even worse if a
new editor submitted them. Is that a valid point? That obscure topics
need experienced Wikipedians to start the articles going, as opposed
to new editors trying to do the same?
Anyone agree that the high-hanging fruit are more likely to get new
editors bitten?
Carcharoth