Im working on a toolserver based tool if anyone would be interested. Im
doing some basic parsing now.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:10 PM, stevertigo <stvrtg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2009/9/18
Charles Matthews <charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com>om>:
> Yes, good, but {{reflist}} is also progress and needs to be made
compatible.
David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Shirley {{reflist}} should be made options for
<references>. Does it
do anything other than pretty formatting?
Agree with David, and even without considering the superficial
differences, a hard-coded function should take preference over a
template hack. The latter doesn't appear to solve the present issue
which is editing being obstructed by large in-text citations. Andrew's
hack seems to be more than sufficient.
The issue then is that a bot would be relied upon to do the moves -
section edits means that adding citations will continue to work in the
normal in-text fashion, and even in less common full-page edits we
don't necessarily expect people to manually put citations in the
references section. So.. a massive wave of site-wide bot-edits
followed by a persistent bot?
Be interesting to see if just leaving a site-wide worknote above the
titlespace would get most of the job done with user cycles.
-Stevertigo
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l