On 15 June 2010 11:51, Andrew Gray andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk wrote:
On 15 June 2010 09:54, Michael Peel email@mikepeel.net wrote:
From a media contact point of view: one of the first things the media want are examples where it will be used, which is somewhat of a difficult question to answer when a) the community hasn't made its mind up, and b) even if it has, the community can change its mind at any time. ;-)
Someone proposed the daily FAs, which I think are an excellent idea from an exposure perspective, but I don't know whether that got the nod or not.
We don't currently protect FAs, do we? I thought we kept them unprotected and dealt with the inevitable vandalism, as a matter of principle (we're the encyclopaedia anyone can edit, so our most prominent article should be editable). I think the consensus is that pending changes should only be used (at least during the trial) on articles that would otherwise be protected.