On 5/30/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
WR doesn't qualify for citation under [[WP:V]] or
Do we have to recapitulate all the old arguments? There are NO links
to WR in article space, and IIRC none in article talk space either.
ALL of the links are in user or project space or their talk pages,
where those policies are not germane in the way that is implied here.
There are numerous RfC/ArbCom links to WR, which is hardly surprising,
since it is the ONLY reliable source as to its own content. Be that as
it may, an entire post of mine was deleted because I tried to cite the
actual contents of WR in the attack sites discussion. Just call me