Anthere wrote:
Erik Moeller a écrit:
That's completely pointless if the user
doesn't really care about
what version a page remains in but enjoys the process of fighting
per se. That seems to be the case with Wik. He reverts, reverts,
reverts, reverts, then he even *asks* for protection of the page. As
soon as it becomes unprotected again, he will continue reverting to
his preferred version. This happened with [[McFly]] -- I unprotected
it three times already, and every time Wik came back to revert it
almost instantly. It is protected to this day. So what are we gonna
do -- keep it protected forever? That is an unfair punishment of
everyone else.
Keep it protected for Wik only. Open for others.
As a semi-permanent solution, it is a very poor one. As a temporary
solution (as in 24 hours or less), perhaps it could be useful, but only
in extreme cases. Merely breaking the 3 revert rule is not sufficient.