Anthere wrote:
Erik Moeller a écrit:
That's completely pointless if the user doesn't really care about what version a page remains in but enjoys the process of fighting per se. That seems to be the case with Wik. He reverts, reverts, reverts, reverts, then he even *asks* for protection of the page. As soon as it becomes unprotected again, he will continue reverting to his preferred version. This happened with [[McFly]] -- I unprotected it three times already, and every time Wik came back to revert it almost instantly. It is protected to this day. So what are we gonna do -- keep it protected forever? That is an unfair punishment of everyone else.
Keep it protected for Wik only. Open for others.
As a semi-permanent solution, it is a very poor one. As a temporary solution (as in 24 hours or less), perhaps it could be useful, but only in extreme cases. Merely breaking the 3 revert rule is not sufficient.