On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
How about this as an alternative, taken from some past
arbitration
cases: do not publish private emails on Wikipedia.
I doubt that in such Arbcom cases, they even considered the possibility that
the private correspondence was being posted because it attacks a third party.
Arbcom doesn't make policy, and their rulings are highly dependent on the
facts of the specific case even if they're not phrased that way, and this is
a prime example of it. They wouldn't have thought of this situation, and
their rulings shouldn't be used as if they did.