Yes, I was thinking this should be moved to the VP also.
On Jan 18, 2008 10:43 AM, Martijn Hoekstra <martijnhoekstra(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Good point.
Is it a good idea to split of a new discussion from this thread about
the proposal to limit sandbox history in this way, or maybe set up
some discussion at the village pump?
On Jan 18, 2008 4:19 PM, Stephen Bain <stephen.bain(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008 2:11 AM, Martijn Hoekstra
<martijnhoekstra(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Sticking
to the issue of a particular bot that would move
[[Wikipedia:Sandbox]] to [[Wikipedia:Sandbox/Trash]], and tag is for
speedy deletion, or if we really want to maintain it, move it to
numbered or dated archives, and then create a new page, we don't need
it to have a sysop bit. The one extra speedy a day is well within the
administrators work capacity.
Note that the sandbox is move-protected, and has been so for a very
long time. Not that that can't be questioned, but it's something to
consider, since if it remains the status quo any bot would need sysop
in order to be able to move it (and presumably move-protect the new
one each day).
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.bain(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l