On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:39:46 +0000, "James Farrar"
<james.farrar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, let's be honest, the number of links in
that category is
> somewhere between three and ten. Ever. So it's not *that* big a
> problem, although it makes sense to try to help good-faith editors
> not to make the same mistake again.
The problem is not so much that the links were removed,
but that some
people are still defending the removal as the right thing to have
done.
No, that's not a problem unless they do it again.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG