Sheldon, if youre there,
Ive looked at some of the material on Disinfopedia, and think most of it too valuable to leave to it alone. I would encourage at some point an integration of those date to Wikipedia-- as much of it is encyclopedic.
The only failing of Disinfo that I can see so far (besides the fact that "Disinfo" doesnt bring up DisP on a Google search) is its disconnection from Wikipedia, and the division of energy that it represents.
Not to mention NPOV -- that the occasional crass comment actually hurts the legitimacy of the DisP as a source.
please see http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_California_recall#The_premise_for_the_rec...
for an example of how Disinfopedia energy would be better served on Wikipedia. Until I made this change, little was present in the article about the Energy crisis.
Respectforking yours, ~S~
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com