Raphael,
I didn't consider what you wrote as a personal attack but was just illustrating that rather than try to argue in support of what you were saying relative to this entire series of discussions you chose to try and argue about myself and how I have supported my own arguments. Nevertheless your good faith gesture is appreciated. You should know as well that my referring to you as a proxy in these discussions is not a personal attack but is a descriptive noun relative to your actions. The defintion of proxy that is most applicable to my utilization of the word from http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=proxy is: n.
1. A person authorized to act for another; an agent or substitute.
In effect through discussions here, Resid Gulerdem authorized you to act on his behalf and create his policy proposal [[WP:OURS]]. Therefore, when you created [[WP:OURS]] you became his proxy. Do you see how that isn't a personal attack?
Sincerely, Scott Stevenson http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Netscott
On 6/6/06, Raphael Wegmann raphael@psi.co.at wrote:
Scott Stevenson wrote:
Raphael Wegmann,
There's a reason that speedy deletion general criteria #5 exists. [[WP:CSD#General_criteria]] You can be sure that such a rule is equally applicable even when such a page is created by a proxy for a banned
user.
<snip> > Please try to be a little bit more creative. I.e. you could try to use words like "disruption" or "proxy" only once in your messages. </snip>
I understand why you are resorting to [[ad hominem]] attacks as it is evident that you haven't got much else to argue with.
Quid pro quo.
Let me make a suggestion: I apologize for this personal attack and you stop calling me a proxy.
-- Raphael _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l