On 3/15/07, Rich Holton <richholton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I am truly puzzled that there is no further reaction
to the issue that I
brought up with my earlier post. Have we really come to the point where
where have a de-facto class of editors who are un-revertable, where
reverting them is seen to be an offense, regardless of the merits of the
case?
Worst case scenario: We have a class of editors who are un-revertable,
consisting of Jimbo and Danny and no one else. This is not a very bad
case - we can trust them not to make harmful edits. And it's not even
the case. So let's drop it.
Steve