On 12/16/06, Parker Peters <onmywayoutster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Incidentally, RunedChozo did not consist of the 'other' side of the
debate.
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muhammad_as_a_diplomat&diff=9…
- or how about
this:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muhammad_as_a_diplomat&d…
- Proabivouac reverts to Alecmconroy instead of one forward to
RunedChozo,
where the only diff between the two was the insertion of that OR. or;
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muhammad_as_a_diplomat&diff=9…
where Proabivouac again reverts to three versions back to Arrow instead
of
two versions back to RunedChozo, where the diff between the two is that
same
OR (minus a lead tag).
You're out of line, mister.
Spare me the rhetoric, please.
No, you're out of line. Every edit YOU point to predates the introduction
of source, after which they started reverting to RunedChozo's version with
source. And you've yet to satisfactorily provide any evidence for your
assertion that the source doesn't support it, beyond your say-so.
I don't think you are being honest here.
Parker
Well, I'm off for the holidays, you all have fun, enjoy the season, Merry
Christmas to those who'll take it, and all that.
I'll revisit this once I return.
Parker