On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 08:58:18 +1000, Brian Salter-Duke
<b_duke(a)bigpond.net.au> wrote:
Maybe they are, but I have to express some
dissappointment about our
Physics articles. Many of them are over-complex and in particular do not
lead into the complexity with a simple introduction so the reader who
knows nothing about the topic will at least get an idea of what the
article is about.
This is certainly true of some of the more obscure topics. I am
reasonably well educated (good honours degree in electrical
engineering), but have found at least half a dozen articles on physics
topics that were close to unintelligible.
Some of this is due to the articles I get drawn to: in most cases it's
because some loon is trying to rewrite the article to more accurately
explain this Great New Way of looking at it that the journals
inexplicably fail to follow up. If you get my drift.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG