Surely is Brandt comitting a criminal offense?
I think the article should be deleted, as articles are often deleted after
the request of the subject.
On 6/11/06, Sean Barrett <sean(a)epoptic.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Phil Sandifer stated for the record:
Daniel Brandt is a notable public figure. By all
rights, he should
have an article in Wikipedia. And the article we have on him is a
good one.
We should also, after contacting Brandt, delete it.
<reasoning snipped>
?We never pay any-one Dane-geld,
No matter how trifling the cost;
For the end of that game is oppression and shame,
And the nation that plays it is lost!?
See also Terrorists#negotiating with
- --
Sean Barrett | I don't have a beer gut, I have a
sean(a)epoptic.com | protective covering for my rock hard abs.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEjFT5MAt1wyd9d+URArltAJ4vxzFYVCDhQvmtNNiIFrN2SMTG/gCfR000
uYVPa7SS+3SUSozJp9PXECo=
=KCR6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
Joe Anderson
[[User:Computerjoe]] on en, fr, de, simple, Meta and Commons.