Surely is Brandt comitting a criminal offense?
I think the article should be deleted, as articles are often deleted after the request of the subject.
On 6/11/06, Sean Barrett sean@epoptic.com wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Phil Sandifer stated for the record:
Daniel Brandt is a notable public figure. By all rights, he should have an article in Wikipedia. And the article we have on him is a good one.
We should also, after contacting Brandt, delete it.
<reasoning snipped>
?We never pay any-one Dane-geld, No matter how trifling the cost; For the end of that game is oppression and shame, And the nation that plays it is lost!?
See also Terrorists#negotiating with
Sean Barrett | I don't have a beer gut, I have a sean@epoptic.com | protective covering for my rock hard abs. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEjFT5MAt1wyd9d+URArltAJ4vxzFYVCDhQvmtNNiIFrN2SMTG/gCfR000 uYVPa7SS+3SUSozJp9PXECo= =KCR6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l