On 12/7/05, Anthony DiPierro <wikilegal(a)inbox.org> wrote:
Frankly, I really don't get it. Siegenthaler is
supposedly a defender
of free speech rights. Doesn't he realize that making ISPs liable for
content spoken by others would stifle free speech? Doesn't he agree
that the ability to speak anonymously is absolutely critical to free
speech?
I think, like a lot of people who grew up in an age when free speech
was something only accredited journalists and their sources exercised,
he preferred that system. Today's "everyone can be a journalist"
Internet bothers a lot of people.
-Matt